|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What were the other lights
seen by Col Halt?
As well as the flashing light near ground
level that was seen to the east, Col. Halt’s memo on the
Rendlesham Forest sightings reported three starlike objects in
the sky at about 10 degrees altitude, one in the south and two
others in the north. The one in the south, which was the most
prominent, was visible for two or three hours and was reported
to beam down a stream of light from time to time.
Some UFO researchers have failed to
distinguish the fact that these starlike objects were quite
different from the original flashing light to the east and have
referred disparagingly to the “flying lighthouse”
as though all the lights were caused by the same highly mobile
object. Even Col. Halt has fallen into this trap, indicating
that his own memory of events has become distorted with time.
In my original investigation, I tentatively
identified these three starlike objects as real stars:
first-magnitude Deneb and Vega in the north, and Sirius, the
brightest star in the sky, in the south. I reached my
conclusion before Col. Halt’s tape recording of events
was released. That tape contains additional information about
the positions of these objects which allows us to make a more
secure identification.
On the tape, Halt describes the starlike
object to the south as “hovering over Woodbridge base at
about five to ten degrees off the horizon” at 4 am. By
Woodbridge base he cannot have meant the runway, which was west
of them, so presumably he meant the buildings. We do not know
exactly where Col. Halt was when he taped that note, but from
his patrol’s likely position either in the forest or on
their way back to East Gate the base buildings would not in
fact have been due south of them but southwest. A simple
planetarium computer program shows that this is indeed where
Sirius was slowly setting, being at an altitude of about 7
degrees when Halt taped his note at 4 am. If Halt’s
definition of north was similarly skewed, this supports the
identification of Deneb and Vega, which were actually east of
north.
Some researchers have been unconvinced by
these prosaic identifications, citing Halt’s taped
description of the objects as "dancing about with coloured
lights on them" (in his memo he had said they “moved
rapidly in sharp, angular movements and displayed red, green
and blue lights”). But of course stars twinkle many
colours as their light is refracted by the atmosphere, and the
effect is most noticeable when they are near the horizon, as
they were in this instance. In another common effect, stars
appear to move from side to side due to movements in the
observer’s eye (the so-called autokinetic effect). When they are seen between scudding cloud they
can appear to be moving when it’s actually the cloud
that’s moving.
Another of Halt’s descriptions,
contained on tape and in his memo, is that the objects appeared
as ‘half-moons turning to full circles’ seen
through an 8–12 power lens (presumably zoom binoculars or
a monocular), but this was evidently an optical effect as he
attempted to focus the binoculars.
More puzzling, perhaps, is this quotation
from Halt’s tape: “Here he comes from the south.
He’s coming toward us now. Now we’re observing what
appears to be a beam coming down to the ground”.
Of course, the brilliance of objects such
as Sirius causes dazzle in the eye which can give the
impression of beams (as with the ‘fiery
cross’ effect of Venus).
But what could cause stars apparently to move towards or away
from the observer? The answer is obscuration by thin, moving
cloud. The resulting changes in the brightness of a star can
give the false impression of approach (brightening) or
recession (dimming). The length of time for which the starlike
objects were viewed (several hours) reinforces the belief that
they were in fact stars.
To me, the descriptions attributed to the
“starlike objects” sound like the standard
misperceptions of celestial objects which feature in so many
other UFO reports.
Finally, what did Halt do about these
unidentified lights supposedly gallivanting in his airspace? As
he told journalist Salley Rayl in an interview published in the
1994 April issue of Omni: “I called the command post, asked them to
call Eastern Radar [i.e. RAF Watton], responsible for air
defense of that sector. Twice they reported that they didn't
see anything.”
After that there was not much more to do.
Near the end of his tape, he says: “03:30 and the objects
are still in the sky, although the one to the south looks like
it’s losing a little bit of altitude. We’re turning
around and heading back toward the base.”
Halt confirmed this in his interview with
Salley Rayl: “After an hour or so, I finally made the
call to go in. We left those things out there.”
What a curiously unsatisfactory way to end
a supposed close encounter – “We left those things
out there.”
Content last updated: 2007 May 24
© Ian Ridpath. All rights reserved
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||