|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Astronomical causes of UFOs – continued
In recent years, I have seen a number of
videos taken with hand-held camcorders which appear to show
saucer-shaped objects making erratic motions in the evening
sky. These videos are clearly of Venus in twilight. The
“movement”, noticeable only when the camera is
zoomed in, is due simply to tremors in the hands of the excited
camera operator, while the apparent shapes of the objects are
optical effects in the camera itself. Parenthetically, video
evidence has also made it clear that many daytime UFOs are now
caused by small, shiny helium-filled balloons of the type given
out at fairgrounds. In addition, a type of rotating reflective
kite called the UFO SAM has made its own contribution to sightings. More
recently, small decorative hot air balloons called Sky Lanterns or UFO Balloons
have joined the list of culprits, generating reports of
orange-coloured “saucer fleets”. (For more about
fire balloon misidentifications and pranks, see here and here). Another
addition to the list, brought to my attention by someone who
was temporarily fooled by one at night, are kites and balloons designed to scare birds. Even black plastic bags, when heated by the Sun, can become UFO-like balloons.
Getting back to astronomy, it is
understandable that people can misidentify planets and bright
stars – but surely not the Moon? Yet it happens. Allan
Hendry describes a case in which three witnesses observed a
saucer “25 ft in diameter” accompanied by two
pulsating lights which hovered over a car park for nearly an
hour, dimming the car park lights as though draining power from
them. A humming noise was heard which changed to a loud beeping
before the saucer shot straight up into the sky. A parakeet
owned by one of the witnesses screeched and her dogs barked.
The woman felt as though she was in a trance and could hardly
move.
This has all the hallmarks of a classic UFO
case: electromagnetic effects, animal reactions, and physical
effects on the witnesses. However, Hendry determined that the
witnesses were looking at the crescent Moon (the
“saucer”) with Mars and Jupiter next to it (the
“pulsating lights”). The dimming of the car park
lights was caused by intermittent mist which eventually
obscured the Moon and planets. The rest of the report is a
marvellous product of human imagination.
Meteors (bits of dust and rock from space
burning up in the atmosphere to produce a briliant streak of
light) are less easy to identify after the event because of
their transient nature. Humans are as bad at estimating time as
they are at estimating brightness and distance, and reports
often exaggerate the duration for which a meteor was seen. Very
bright meteors – say, brighter than the planet Venus
– are termed fireballs. These are so bright they can be caught on
normal video cameras, and a fascinating selection of sightings
can be found on this
page – particularly
impressive is the Perth fireball of 2005, filmed by chance
during a family party at a house in Western Australia, which
generated widespread reports of an aircraft crash [2.5 MB AVI file].
At the same time as this UFO
“encounter”, a brilliant daylight fireball broke up
into several flaming pieces over the United States, and there
seems little doubt that this is what the pilots saw, despite
the fact that it was actually over 100 miles away from, them.
So even experienced pilots can make major errors of
identification and distance. That doesn’t make them bad
airmen, simply human. The encounter near Manchester reported at
the start of this article seems to have been a more modest
example of the same thing. For an example of how a brilliant
fireball and bright stars featured in a multi-witness sighting
involving the US Air Force, see my investigation of the
celebrated Rendlesham Forest UFO case.
Even sightings involving military radar are
no more likely to involve “genuine” UFOs. In 1989 a
series of reports began to emanate from Belgium, culminating on
the night of 1990 March 30–31 with widespread sightings
by police and an aerial “chase” by Belgian Air
Force F-16 fighters involving radar contact with an
unidentified target. This now-famous event
turned out to have been sparked off by misidentifications of
bright stars and planets while the radar returns were due to atmospheric effects and equipment malfunction. (For a more extensive analysis, see here.) Faced
with cases such as this and Rendlesham, both still declared
unexplained by some UFOlogists, one wonders how far it is
possible to credit any UFO report.
Over half a century after the launch of
Sputnik 1, many people are still surprised to find that
orbiting satellites can be seen from the ground with the naked
eye. Satellites have tricks that can fool even experienced
observers. Some satellites flash as they rotate; others travel
in convoys, including triangular formations; and others fade
and disappear as they enter the Earth’s shadow, giving an
effect that is sometimes described as “vanishing rapidly
upwards”.
I have mentioned the zig-zagging of
satellites due to effects in the eye. In his collection of
essays The View from Serendip (Gollancz, 1978), Arthur C. Clarke
described an unexpected sighting of the balloon satellite Echo
which appeared to stop and hover overhead before resuming its
onward path. The reasons, as he realized afterwards, were that
he and film producer Stanley Kubrick, who was also watching,
were too excited to observe calmly; it is almost impossible to
assess the motion of something overhead; and moonlight had
swamped the background stars against which the motion could be
judged.
Echo, a particularly brilliant satellite,
re-entered long ago, but many other bright satellites have
taken its place, notably the International Space Station. If
real alien spacecraft were whizzing around in orbit they would
rapidly be noticed both by amateur satellite spotters and by
defence radars which are actually designed to look for
spaceships – our own.
Finally, satellite re-entries occur on a
daily basis. In appearance they are similar to fireballs but
can be brighter, longer-lasting, and slower-moving. As a
man-made object burns up it usually fragments into numerous
pieces, giving the impression of a cigar-shaped UFO with
portholes.
For instance, a widely reported sighting
over the British Isles early on 1993 March 31 termed the Cosford Incident is now known to have been caused by the
re-entry of the rocket that launched the Russian Cosmos 2238
satellite into orbit, combined with the misidentification of a
police helicopter by a meteorologist at an RAF base an hour and
a half later. Yet the MoD investigator at the time, Nick Pope,
declared: “It seems that an unidentified object of
unknown origin was operating in the UK Air Defence Region
without being detected on radar.” Hence another solved
case has come to be regarded by some as an officially
recognized UFO.
Satellite predictions, including flashes
from Iridium satellites, can be obtained for any location in
the world from the web site hosted by the German Aerospace
Centre (DLR) on http://www.heavens-above.com
Good UFO spotting!
© Ian Ridpath. All rights reserved
Content last updated 2009 June
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||